Someone
asked me this question the other day. A great discussion starter as it pits two
parts of career satisfaction against each other: the need to earn a living
versus the need to be mentally stimulated. Many people would agree with me that
the ideal would be a meaningful combination of the two, yet when faced with the
prospect of only one of the two, we have a dilemma.
As life has
it, we all need some form of income to survive, so not having one is not really
an option. Our culture has also shifted to measuring success by amount of wealth acquired,
and signalling this achievement through the objects one owns. These are all
thrown in our face on a daily basis by richer individuals so it is easy to think: ‘if I only had more money I
would be happier’. However what nobody tells you is that money doesn’t breed
contentment and neither does poverty so obviously there is a balance to be
reached. However, the enemy of greed is contentment so how to be contented?
There are
three routes to contentment and while I believe that one can aim for one route only, greater satisfaction or contentment can be achieved by addressing a
combination of the three routes. These
are:
- Wealth
- Altruism
- Creativity
The
blessings of wealth are easy to imagine and we can all think of things we would
do if we had just a little bit more money. However, the happiness derived from
acquiring objects is short-lived and opens us up to desiring more, very soon.
Altruism is
another avenue and I would argue that anyone involved in the caring professions,
medicine, charity work, social services or even volunteer work are partially or
entirely motivated by this. Altruism gives you the opportunity to create
meaning in your life by being meaningful to someone else. This is something we
all long for, but mostly we tend to settle for just being there for our loved ones,
extending a helping hand to a stranger seems odd, if not even outright scary in
our modern, safety-obsessed world.
Lastly, I
mention creativity. Everyone gets given a box of crayons in kindergarten, yet
some of us go off into making creativity the heart of our professional life.
Many assume creativity means painting pretty pictures and being artistic, but
creativity takes many forms - one frequently quoted is the ability to
problem-solve. The satisfaction of solving a difficult problem, regardless of
what profession you are in, is you manifesting your creativity and deriving
satisfaction from it.
So if
someone paid me loads of money to do a really boring job, would I do it? I can’t
say yes or no for sure, but I would find out what the job was, how much I would
get paid and how much of my time it would take up, and for how long I needed to
do it, before moving on. Why? Well, it
is foolish to think that our day jobs will be able to single-handedly satisfy
all the needs of stimulation we need, all the time, without fail. No doubt it
is a benefit to be able to have as many of the things that you really enjoy
(learning, variation, creativity, social interaction, responsibility,
challenges, great salary etc.) in your day job, but it is just as important to
understand what those needs are that you have and make alternate plans if you
aren’t getting what you need from work. If you end up having a dull job, don’t
just settle for that and spend your life feeling depressed and undervalued. Take
time to understand what it is that you need in your life to be stimulated,
contented and continuously developing and make sure you have those elements as
part of your spare time instead. That way you can put up with a boring job and
still be happy.
a lot of editors have started to understand more about alternate options, they will obtained a little cameras, spend some money to hire nearby residents and individuals across the actors within the facilities.
Posted by: Canada Goose Jacket | November 25, 2011 at 06:34
フィンペシア http://funvalue.info
フィンペシア価格 http://www.absinthemarket.com
ロゲイン通販 http://www.think-create.net
ロゲイン効果 http://hregrow.info
ロゲイン通販 http://rogein.plusfor.net
薄毛 プロペシア効果 http://www.edaindesigns.com
プロペシア通販比較 http://www.sititop.com
プロペシア通販比較 http://generic.finasteride.jp
プロペシア通販 http://www.bjbzgg.com
プロペシア通販 http://pro-pecia.net
Posted by: プロペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 20:34
As long as it didn't bind me to a long-term commitment, I would absolutely do a boring job for boatloads of money. While there, I could channel my creative and altruistic desires into my time off work (which, if the pay was enough, could be a substantial portion of the year).
Even if it was 16hrs a day 7 days a week (for seriously beaucoup bucks) -- save as much as possible for a period of time, enough that you would never have to work again. Of course, I would continue to work in some capacity or another, but I could do what I really want (again, creative/altruistic), and not just do what provides the best life balance (salary, hours, stress, personal fulfillment).
Posted by: wolske | March 28, 2006 at 22:47